INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT ON PUBLIC HEALTH SCANDAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

1. Case Summary

This report denounces a large-scale public health scandal directly affecting a population of seven million people and, indirectly, other communities worldwide. The responsible state has implemented chemical measures that alter human brain function, causing adverse effects on freedom of thought and sexuality. This action constitutes a severe violation of fundamental human rights and could be classified as a crime against humanity.

2. Types of Crimes Committed

• Crime against public health: Administration of substances that alter the physiology and behavior of the population.
• Violation of fundamental rights: Systematic restriction of freedom of expression, thought, and sexuality.
• Persecution of specific groups: Application of discriminatory measures against individuals with particular psychological and intellectual traits.
• Crimes against humanity: Deliberate actions that align with the definitions of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

3. Institution for Filing the Complaint

Given the lack of response from national authorities, this complaint will be formally submitted to the European Commission, the EU institution responsible for ensuring compliance with European regulations, including those concerning fundamental rights and public health. The European Commission has the authority to initiate infringement proceedings against Member States violating EU law.

Additionally, further legal actions may be pursued in:

• European Court of Human Rights (ECHR): If violations fall under the European Convention on Human Rights.
• United Nations (UN): Specifically, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health.
• International Criminal Court (ICC, The Hague): If the violations are deemed to constitute crimes against humanity.

4. Evidence and Proof

Medical and toxicological reports demonstrating the alteration of the population’s neurochemistry.

Testimonies from affected individuals and public health experts.

Government documentation proving the implementation of these measures.

Records of censorship and repression against those exposing these facts.

5. Proposed Actions

Formal submission of the complaint to the European Commission through its official mechanisms.

Request for an EU infringement procedure against the responsible state.

Dissemination through international media to prevent suppression of the case.

Coordination with human rights NGOs to reinforce the investigation.

Request for precautionary measures to protect affected individuals and halt the continuation of these actions.

6. Recipients of the Complaint

European Commission: Submission via the official portal with a request for infringement proceedings.

European Court of Human Rights (ECHR): Potential appeal under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR): Submission through the individual communications mechanism.

International Criminal Court (ICC, The Hague): Filing a complaint for crimes against humanity.

Media and NGOs (Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, investigative journalists): To increase pressure and prevent the case from being silenced.

7. Conclusions

Given the gravity of the exposed facts, it is imperative to take coordinated action at the European level by submitting this complaint to the European Commission, which has the competence to address violations of EU law. Parallel efforts in international legal bodies and human rights organizations will further strengthen accountability and justice for those affected.